Why is she there, again?

The topics of discussion before the House Foreign Affairs committee ranged from the $900 million in aid pledged to Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza to Dick Cheney’s claim that classified documents prove the Bush administration’s interrogation methods on suspected terrorists yielded vital intelligence.

“Well, it won’t surprise you that I don’t consider him a particularly reliable source of information,” Clinton said of the former vice president.

What a smug, self-important twit.  She’s asked about releasing specific documents that Cheney mentioned would show the effectiveness of interrogations, and she takes the occasion to attack Cheney’s character.  Not only is she smug, but doesn’t she see the irony in being married to one of the least-reliable, lying jackballs on the planet, who she was more than happy to have out campaigning across America for her wide ass?  She’s the most cheated-on woman in American history, and she’s lecturing Congress about her judgment of character and representing the country in all things diplomatic?  None of this shit makes sense!

Wasn’t Barack Obama’s administration going to ring in a new era of bipartisanship and harmony?  Who the hell are these people?