2009/10/12
What is money? Part 3
So to sum up what I’ve written so far in Part 1 and Part 2:
1. The value of something is determined by what someone is willing trade for it.
2. Money is a medium of exchange, and as such it only works if people think it’s worth something.
3. Money is valuable because the government says it is, but
4. The more money that’s available in circulation, the less valuable it is.
So now let’s close the loop on that last one. Money isn’t backed by anything solid or valuable. It’s only backed by the promise of the government that issues it to be responsible with it. If the government allows too much of it to be created, the value of the money relative to the amount of goods declines. Also, if the government itself becomes unstable or appears to be irresponsible, or reaches a point where it appears to be unable to support its debt, the value of that money will decline. People will want less of something if they’re uncertain that its going to be as valuable tomorrow as it is today.
So that’s how we get exchange rates. If your country is politically stable, responsible with the amount of money it creates, and responsible with its debt load, foreigners with less stable currency will want to hold your currency instead. People have liked the dollar more than other currencies for a long time because of America’s political stability, military strength, vast industrial base, prospects for growth, etc.
There’s been talk through the years of creating a new world currency backed by oil, but that petro-currency would be backed by a lot of goofy countries with goofy leaders and populations that are dominated by a goofy religion that encourages self-detonation and Jew-killing when things aren’t going right. That’s a little too much uncertainty for people who don’t want to risk their money. Similarly, up until recently with the introduction of the Euro, no single European currency was very attractive, what with the European tendency to reduce its infrastructure to rubble and population to corpses every few decades.
By comparison, the dollar looked pretty sweet.
But now, for many reasons (most of them self-inflicted) the dollar is weakening relative to other currencies. China and India have emerged as real economic players. American deficits are skyrocketing, and we’re making money out of nothing to pay for them. Our industrial base is moving off-shore. We seem to be intent on expanding the welfare state, further burdening the producers while increasing benefits for non-producers. Our economic health now rests not with ourselves, but in the hands of a couple of Asian countries who have been willing to buy our government’s debt since we’re addicted to spending more than we earn, but who are now not so sure they want to keep buying and holding quite so much.
So things aren’t quite as rosy as they used to be.
Filed under Economy, Philosophy by kodewords





Comments on What is money? Part 3 »
This was a very good series for people who are just now learning about monetary theory. Well done.
—
For this reason, whoever desires liberty, should understand these vital facts, viz.: 1. That every man who puts money into the hands of a “government” (so called), puts into its hands a sword which will be used against him, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. 2. That those who will take his money, without his consent, in the first place, will use it for his further robbery and enslavement, if he presumes to resist their demands in the future. 3. That it is a perfect absurdity to suppose that any body of men would ever take a man’s money without his consent, for any such object as they profess to take it for, viz., that of protecting him; for why should they wish to protect him, if he does not wish them to do so? To suppose that they would do so, is just as absurd as it would be to suppose that they would take his money without his consent, for the purpose of buying food or clothing for him, when he did not want it. 4. If a man wants “protection,” he is competent to make his own bargains for it; and nobody has any occasion to rob him, in order to “protect” him against his will. 5. That the only security men can have for their political liberty, consists in their keeping their money in their own pockets, until they have assurances, perfectly satisfactory to themselves, that it will be used as they wish it to be used, for their benefit, and not for their injury. 6. That no government, so called, can reasonably be trusted for a moment, or reasonably be supposed to have honest purposes in view, any longer than it depends wholly upon voluntary support.
-Lysander Spooner