Is Eric Holder evil, or just a self-serving jackass?

Would it be improper, or at least appear improper, to ship a high-profile terrorist mastermind to New York City to be tried in a civilian court when you used to be a senior partner at a law firm that goes out of its way to defend terrorists? What if you used to make a lot of money doing so?

What if that same company gave you a $5 million bonus as you left it to take on a new job as Attorney General of the United States? Would that strike you as possibly being a conflict of interest? Would an extensive personal history of defending terrorists and endorsing the Presidential pardons of convicted terrorists seem to reinforce the idea that you might have some kind of soft spot for the worst people on Earth? Or not?

Will criticizing the corrupt sleazeball who serves as Attorney General put the author of this blog post on some kind of FBI watch list? I’ve got to know.