Science at its heart is nothing more than a search for truth. It’s the pursuit of understanding. It’s the gathering of precise and accurate information that describes the universe we live in. Science should be ideologically and politically independent and pure.

Science is also a human endeavor. No other species seeks understanding like we do. And God, however you understand him, has no use for it; He IS science.

Therefore, since science is human, science is corruptible. And science is corrupt.

1,000 emails and more than 3,000 other documents from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University in the United Kingdom publicly revealed by a hacker, or allegedly an inside whistleblower, are rekindling the flame to the global warming debate just weeks before the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference where the United States will propose an emissions reduction target. A sample of what the emails exposed, which date back 13 years, includes:

“The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.”

And:

“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”

And:

“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report,” Jones writes. “Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!”

Some have argued the quotes have been taken out of context while others say the context is clear as day. Other information was erased completely to prevent it from being obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. And others believe “that this is not a scandal so much as a window on real scientists working on a politicized issue.”

This is the greatest scandal in human history. Countries have signed treaties based on data that has been altered and while other data has been "hidden." The central scientists can’t explain why there hasn’t been warming, and think it’s a "travesty." They seek to exclude information from UN reports on climate change, rather than simply present the truth.

We’re being asked to use expensive, more dangerous light bulbs we use because of this. We’re asked to drive certain cars because of this. We’re asked to eliminate meat from our diets because of this. We’re asked to give up our nation’s sovereignty because of this. We’re asked to pay more for energy because of this. Our auto industry was driven into collapse partly because of government hysteria based on outright lies about climate change. General Electric has based its business model on solar panels and windmills. The corruption of science has directly affected our lives, from the global level, all the way down to the stuff we keep in our own homes.

The question, now that the skepticism many of us have had about the climate change scam has been confirmed, is why? Control, of course. And money.

These scientists have been funded by GOVERNMENT GRANTS. Therefore, it’s theoretically, and now apparently actually was, in the scientists’ best interest to find and deliver data that supported the global government agenda. And what’s the government’s agenda? Central control, fascism, restrictions on freedom of property, freedom of movement, freedom of association. In all of human history, the agenda of any government is incompatible with individual liberty. Therefore, government-funded science is a tool of tyranny.

Al Gore has become an incredibly wealthy man based on this scam. He’s been the manufactured crisis’s chief salesman, and has profited quite nicely. Yet he’s seen as some kind of crusading hero rather than simply a cynical televangelist. His scientific mentors have been discredited over and over again for decades, but he still cites them. If there’s any justice, his career should be over.

The president’s science czar advocates forced abortions and mass sterilization in response to global catastrophes that he thought were going to come about due to human-caused climate change. If there’s any justice, he’ll be removed from office.

This is a revolutionary time. Everything we’re told is based on lies. Central governments are losing their moral authority to lead. Nation-states all over the world are being unveiled as corrupt, inhumane, lying, oppressive, and paranoid. They have their greasy tentacles in the media, science, entertainment, education, and increasingly, churches. And it’s been going on for decades.

Anything you thought was true 5, 10, 20, 50 maybe even 100 years ago, isn’t. Anybody who still can’t see simply has his eyes shut.

The greatest (worst?) part of this failure of science is that basic truth has become a casualty. They’ve brought about a condition where honest discovery must be met with extreme skepticism. They’ve brought about a situation where the smartest among us can’t be trusted, which could allow a new age of superstition and fear to finally destroy our age of enlightenment. Their lack of a solid moral compass has undermined their influence. And because of that, we’re one step closer to the edge of a new dark age. Too much of our faith was placed in the hands of prideful, weak, corrupt, ridiculous men. Our founders warned us. God warned us. And yet, here we are.

Blasts from the past!  Here are some posts from a year ago this week on kodewords.com:

• Al Gore’s global warming consensus that doesn’t exist
• Barack Obama’s campaign website scrubs criticism of the troop surge
• Barack Obama versus George W. Bush on American intellectual capacity
• Nancy Pelosi calls domestic oil drilling a hoax

Hot on the heels of Prince Charles’s horsecrap, calling for the end of capitalism, consumerism and individual liberty, we have the Grand Wizard declaring Cap & Trade a first step toward “global governance.”

Here’s the thing. Americans are right to be skeptical about talk like this.  We have a history that acknowledges individual liberties, freedom and national sovereignty. Treaties, once signed and confirmed, become the law of the land, and it’s yet another backdoor for socialism to sneak in and restrict our rights to property, mobility and commerce. Our Democrat overlords have made it very clear that socialism is the goal, freedom be damned.

Former Vice President Al Gore declared that the Congressional climate bill will help bring about “global governance.”

“Just two weeks ago, the House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey climate bill,” Gore said, noting it was “very much a step in the right direction.” President Obama has pushed for the passage of the bill in the Senate and attended a G8 summit this week where he agreed to attempt to keep the Earth’s temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees C.

Gore touted the Congressional climate bill, claiming it “will dramatically increase the prospects for success” in combating what he sees as the “crisis” of man-made global warming.

“But it is the awareness itself that will drive the change and one of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements.”

Any time we enter into an agreement that involves “global governance” we risk giving up some of our sovereignty, which means that as a nation we give up some of our ability to self-govern. The countries we enter into these agreements with don’t necessarily see things through the lens of freedom, because they may not have constitutions that guarantee rights or limit government’s influence. The only people who care about freedom in these kinds of negotiations are American citizens. It’s too important to leave the decision-making up to dipshits like Al Gore and the US Senate.

To clarify what the goal of all this is, here’s another little gem from the article that illustrates the dangers involved here. Remember, Al Gore is the guy who is trying to get stuff done, and therefore has to couch his ideas in less threatening terms. The activists and true believers, on the other hand, get to say what’s really on their minds:

The environmental group Friends of the Earth advocated the transfer of money from rich to poor nations during the 2007 UN climate conference.

"A climate change response must have at its heart a redistribution of wealth and resources,” said Emma Brindal, a climate justice campaigner coordinator for Friends of the Earth.

Global governance, to the environmental movement, is an opportunity to “spread the wealth around” on a global scale. It’s not about clean air or clean water or saving the planet. It’s about control, control, control. From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Communism didn’t die with the Soviet Union. It just found a new home in the environmental movement.

John Holdren, Obama’s new Science Czar (HT http://zombietime.com/)

In 1977, he coauthored a book that stated:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives — using an armed international police force.

He coauthored the book with that other batshit insane “scientist” Paul Ehrlich, Al Gore’s end-of-the-world guru.  To the left, science and politics are inseparable, they reinforce one another in pursuit of a humanist, materialist, anthropocentric worldview that restricts individual freedom and imposes centralized control.  With the left’s history of dabbling in eugenics and their attachment to the sacred right of abortion, official appointments of people who are advocates of abhorrent population control methods shouldn’t come as a surprise.

Do you really think the Obama administration didn’t know about this book?  Of course they did.  They either agree with him or they don’t care. They’re not afraid of the fallout anymore.  There’s something about this fellow’s opinions that they think are important enough to place him in an unelected, unaccountable office that’s apparently going to set science policy for the country.

Prince Charles delivers another argument for the end of monarchy. He’s not just a fear-mongering oligarch, he’s a very specific fear-mongering oligarch.

Capitalism and consumerism have brought the world to the brink of economic and environmental collapse, the Prince of Wales has warned in a grandstand speech which set out his concerns for the future of the planet.

The heir to the throne told an audience of industrialists and environmentalists at St James’s Palace last night that he had calculated that we have just 96 months left to save the world.

And in a searing indictment on capitalist society, Charles said we can no longer afford consumerism and that the "age of convenience" was over.

Compare this with Mr Obama’s assertion during the campaign that, "We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK.” It looks like the message is clear: individual freedom is on the outs.

The environmental elitists are inextricably bound to the idea that free market is bad, that capitalism is bad, that individuals buying the “wrong” things and controlling the temperature in our homes is bad. The only way to address climate change is to destroy the liberties that allow people to decide for themselves how to spend their own money and live their lives. We can argue about how best to generate electricity and power our cars. Those are technological issues. But to the statists, the technological problems are secondary to their desire to centralize control and to remake the world into one where they get to say what we make, what we buy, how we live.

It’s not an issue of technology to them. It’s an issue of politics.

Despite his attack on the materialism of the modern age, the Prince has been criticized for his own indulgences, including dozens of staff to run his homes and hundreds of thousands of pounds spent travelling around the world. While his private estates on the Duchy of Cornwall generate record profits his tax bill was lower than the year before.

Last night the Prince said: "But for all its achievements, our consumerist society comes at an enormous cost to the Earth and we must face up to the fact that the Earth cannot afford to support it. Just as our banking sector is struggling with its debts – and paradoxically also facing calls for a return to so-called ‘old-fashioned’, traditional banking – so Nature’s life-support systems are failing to cope with the debts we have built up there too.

He’s a hypocrite. He’s a man of extreme privilege, wealth and property telling the rest of us to stop consuming the world’s resources. He wants to stop us from ever acquiring any level of prestige or power or wealth that’s even a fraction of what he has. He invokes the economic crisis that was primarily caused by government policy as an argument against capitalism and freedom. He’s always been a goofy buffoon, but now he’s a dangerous goofy buffoon.